NORA Logo

NORA

NPCIL Officers & Retirees Association
  • Home
  • About Us+
    Overview
    • About Association
    • Aims of the Association
    Legal
    • Constituents Association
    • Constitution
    Finance & Audit
    • Audit report
    Team
    • Generals
    • Auditors
    • Editors
  • Governing Council+
    Members
    • List of Members
    Meetings
    • General Body Meeting
    • Executive Body Meeting
    • Notices of Meeting (MOM)
    Elections
    • Election Notifications
  • Membership+
    New Membership
    • Help / How to Join
    • Online Form
    • Hard Copy Form
    Subscription
    • Life Time Membership
    • Annual Membership
    • Patron Membership
    Donation
    • Donation Details
    Payment
    • Bank Details
  • Services & Support+
    Service Matters
    • Consultation
    • Enquiries
    Legal Defence
    • Chargeable Services
    • Free Services
    • Court Cases
    Grievances
    • Grievances Online Form
    • Grievances Offline Form
    Correspondence
    • All Documents
  • Activities+
    Programs
    • Picnic Programs
    • Rejoicing Programs
    • Cultural Programs
    Gallery
    • Photographs
    • Videos
  • Login
  • Login
HomeCouncil
Member
Services
Login

© 2026 NPCIL Officers & Retirees Association (NORA). All rights reserved.

Developed by Cohunt Technologies LLP

← Back to News

IA of NPCIL on contempt of court

PUBLISHED ON: Sunday, October 18, 2026| Tags: Event

On 23.09.2026 NPCIL through filling of Affidavit denied to submit board Subcommittee report to the court quoting that it is an advisory committee & BoD are not bound to consider the recommendation as decision, also NPCIL is not bound produce it before court .

They also denied the pension to NPCIL recruites as per exclusion 16(1)b clause of EPF & MP act 1952 saying that although the clause provides an option to grant CPF or old age pension but being PSU NPCIL under article 13 & 60 (i) is free to frame a pension scheme for the benefit of employees and accordingly they have framed the DCPS 2025 which is a beautiful scheme & more that 90% have opted it .

Simultaneously while misguiding the court with filling these contrary facts they did some blunder , which i would like to use in the process of court hearing .